I heard a news report this morning that Hillary Clinton has begun insisting she get her delegates from Michigan and Florida. Those delegations were stripped after the states moved their primaries to dates before Super Tuesday. That was creating chaos in the primary calendar and did result in both Iowa and New Hampshire moving their dates forward. More such conduct would have made the onset of the election season ridiculous and the DNC did the right thing by putting the kibosh on it all.
So the rules were established. Michigan and Florida not only lost their right to send delegates to Denver but the candidates were forbidden to campaign in either state. Barack Obama, John Edwards and Bill Richardson all pulled their names off the ballot in Michigan so Clinton was the only major candidate on that ballot. Giving her those delegates now would be seen as a clear fix.
Democrats are very wary of a fix this year. They don't want this election decided behind closed doors. They want a transparent process and the angst being displayed is a symptom of this anxiety. Unfortunately a lot of opaqueness is happening and it will never disappear from politics. Both campaign operations are wooing delegates, any delegates they can find. That's all part of the process under the rules. I expect the super delegates will fall pretty much along the lines as the Party electorate.
Michigan and Florida could be the determining factors though and this is a serious issue. Obama obviously does extremely well when he campaigns in a state. His absence from both these primaries hurt his chances. He had no chance in Michigan because he wasn't on their ballot. On the other hand how do we disenfranchise two large states? Could doing so come back and bite us in November?
It's a difficult and tricky issue. What do we do? One solution would be to seat Florida and not Michigan. I don't see any way the Wolverine state can be credentialed. Doing one but not the other may solve the issue. Other suggestions would be barring them from a first ballot only. Delegates are freed after that anyway and both candidates would have the chance to convince them to support their side on a second or third ballot.
Another solution would be to credential both states but divide their delegates equally. Whatever, this will be the first serious order of business at the convention and may determine the nominee. This is why Hillary is already working on it, she obviously doesn't foresee winning the nomination otherwise.
The risk for Clinton's actions is the backlash. The more undecided voters, like me, see these machinations the more likely we are to support Barack Obama. I interpret Clinton's insistence on Michigan as outright cheating. If she insists on those delegates I will endorse Barack Obama. That wasn't a fair election.